Mobile Manual QA - India

About the job

Driivz, a Vontier company, powers the e-mobility revolution with a market-leading, end-to-end EV Charging and Energy Management platform for global charge point operators and electric mobility service providers.

We offer a scalable, integrated SaaS solution that enables our clients to efficiently manage their networks and provide EV drivers with an exceptional charging experience.

Operating in over 35 countries across the US, Europe, and Asia, we enable hundreds of millions of events for millions of EV drivers and manage more than 160,000 public chargers (with 100,000s in roaming).

Our customers include global industry leaders such as EVgo, Volvo Group, Shell, Circle K, Mer, Recharge, Kople, ESB, CEZ, MOL Group, ST1, and eMobility Power.

Join our team to work alongside the most brilliant and disruptive minds focused on leading the eMobility industry and building a greener world.

About the Role

Are you naturally curious, sharp-eyed, and excited by the challenge of holding AI to a higher standard than the humans who built it? Do you treat test cases as a craft, AI-generated suggestions as drafts to be questioned, and the boundary between "looks right" and "is right" as the place your best work happens? If so, this role is for you.

We're looking for the next generation of mobile tester — a Senior Manual QA Engineer who treats AI like a power tool, not a magic wand. You'll join our Mobile team to own quality across the Driivz mobile experience on Android, iOS, and the Driver Portal (Web). You'll work as a peer to our developers and PMs, sit at the table during PI-week QA scoping, and use Claude Code daily — but your judgement, not your prompts, will be the deliverable.

Key Responsibilities

• QA Driivz Mobile EV features such as charging, site discovery, payments, biometrics, history, profile, notifications etc. — across Android (Kotlin), iOS (Swift), and the Driver Portal web flows.
• Author and maintain Testmo cases per the Driivz Testing Guideline; link every case to its Jira story; keep Epic-level QA aggregate estimates honest.
• Participate in PI-week QA scoping: name your test types, environments, risk rating, and cross-flavour scope on every committed Epic (per the QA sub-gate criteria a–d).
• Review product specifications and identify test requirements before stories enter grooming.
• Validate AI-generated test artefacts — cases, scenarios, repro steps — and reject anything that doesn't survive critical review.
• Verify accessibility (TalkBack on Android, VoiceOver on iOS) and localisation (RTL, dates, currencies, numbers) on every shipped feature.
• Triage incoming bugs with clean repro, environment context, logs, and a justified severity.
• Partner with developers on risk-driven exploratory testing — the structured cases catch known unknowns; you find the unknown unknowns.
• Recommend improvements to product behaviour and user experience based on test findings.

What we're looking for

• 4–7 years of hands-on mobile QA on shipped Android + iOS production apps.
• Strong native-platform awareness: Android API 24 → 34+ fragmentation, iOS 15+ background-refresh non-determinism, deep-link routing, push notifications, offline behaviour, biometric auth, lifecycle edge cases.
• Driver Portal / web QA experience — or a strong willingness to span. We don't split testers by platform; you cover the full driver journey.
• Multi-tenant / multi-flavour parametric testing. You don't write a case four times; you write it once and parametrise.
• Accessibility: TalkBack, VoiceOver, contrast ratios, touch-target sizing, keyboard navigation.
• Localisation: RTL handling, locale-dependent formatting.
• Risk-based test depth — you know when 30 cases is right and when 8 plus exploratory is right.
• Network conditioning (Charles or Proxyman); real-device labs and cloud labs (Firebase Test Lab, BrowserStack, or equivalent).
• Comfortable testing RESTful APIs and reading mobile network traces — both client- and server-side awareness.
• Bug triage with clean repro — steps, environment, logs, severity, blast radius. Strong analytical and root-cause skills under pressure.
• Excellent English communication, both verbal and written.
• Self-starter, quick learner, comfortable working independently across cross-functional teams.

Tools you'll use

Testmo · Jira · Confluence · Claude Code + the Driivz plugins · Android Studio · Xcode · Charles / Proxyman · Swagger · Firebase · Teams.

AI-era skills we're hiring for (the differentiator)

• Fluent with Claude Code as a daily tool. Skills, agents, plugins, MCP servers — you use them to accelerate test design, generate edge cases from a spec, and pressure-test acceptance criteria.
• Authoring Testmo cases from a spec with AI scaffolding, then editing with judgement. You know that AI-generated cases are starting points, not deliverables.
• You read AI-generated spec analysis and feedback the Testing Guideline section that applies — shaping the downstream test-case generation before it runs.
• You spot AI failure modes — hallucinated steps, false coverage, plausible-but-wrong assertions, over-generic cases. You treat AI output like a junior engineer's PR: verify before merge.
• You know when NOT to use AI — security-sensitive flows, brand-critical UX moments, exploratory sessions where serendipity is the value, anything with regulatory exposure.
• You'll test code that AI developer agents authored and AI PR-reviewer agents approved — you know how these agents fail, which seams they get wrong, and where regression risk concentrates after AI-authored changes.
• You communicate in chain vocabulary — gates, contracts, state-transitions, Epics, stories. You think in graded handoffs, not just features.

The bar isn't uses AI tools. The bar is judges AI output well.

How we work

• Quality is a gate, not an inspection. We catch issues at PI-week QA scoping, in spec review, and at story decomposition — not in the last sprint of the PI. By the time a story is in-sprint, its Testmo cases already exist.
• Risk decides depth. A high-risk Epic gets exploratory + deep regression + cross-flavour. A low-risk one gets the happy paths and the deltas. You make the call and defend it.
• You own a feature end-to-end across all three surfaces — Android, iOS, Driver Portal. We don't split testers by platform; the same person follows a feature from spec to ship. Context loss is the enemy.
• Pairing over silos. You pair with developers during spec review, exploratory sessions, and defect triage. PMs run their feature templates past you before PI commit. We're async-friendly otherwise.
• Claude is a peer, not a replacement. You delegate scaffolding to it, then verify with your own eyes. We share prompts and skill files the way other teams share code snippets.
• PIs and sprints. We work in PIs with regular sprints inside. QA scoping happens at the start of every PI — that's where you set the type-mix, environments, and risk rating for each Epic you'll own.

Bonus Points

• Espresso, XCTest, KIF, Maestro, Detox, or Playwright familiarity — even just enough to read what the developers wrote.
• CI awareness: tests run there, flakiness is a bug, you don't accept "works on my machine" from yourself either.
• Performance instrumentation (Android Profiler, Instruments) when the feature has perf risk.
• Security and PII discipline — no PII in client logs, ever. (It's a Driivz Mobile rule.)
• Prior experience writing or contributing to a team Testing Guideline.
• Familiarity with cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, or similar) — useful for understanding the backend side of mobile feature tests.
• Knowledge of network protocols (HTTP, TCP) — useful when traces get hairy.
• Automation experience that you can bring into manual workflows when it pays off.